Care is the cornerstone of our practice

Give us a Call
+1 (915) 412-6680
Send us a Message
support@chiromed.com
Opening Hours
Mon-Thu: 7 AM - 7 PM
Fri - Sun: Closed

Overcoming Ethical Conflicts: How Different Ethical Approaches Can Help You Decide

Overview of Ethical Approaches to Resolving Ethical Conflicts

Ethical conflicts are an inevitable part of healthcare, legal, and business environments. Professionals often find themselves grappling with moral dilemmas where deciding between right and wrong is not black and white. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the ethical approaches to resolving ethical conflicts. Understanding these methods is crucial for professionals who wish to navigate ethically complex situations while maintaining moral integrity.

Among the many approaches to ethical decision-making, narrative ethics has gained substantial attention. This method emphasizes the stories of individuals as a pathway for discovering values and meaning in ethical dilemmas. Narrative ethics begins by focusing on the patient’s or individual’s personal story, making it a highly contextual and human-centric approach to solving ethical conflicts. Unlike more theoretical models, narrative ethics lacks rigidity but is valued for its emphasis on empathy and individual experience.

Table: Ethical Approaches and Their Key Characteristics

Ethical ApproachKey CharacteristicsExample
CasuistryFocuses on case-based reasoning. Specific cases are compared to paradigmatic cases to find solutions.Resolving medical disputes by comparing to past cases that involved similar moral dilemmas.
Narrative EthicsUses personal stories to understand ethical dilemmas. The focus is on individual experiences and context.A nurse listens to a patient’s story to understand the deeper values involved in their care decisions.
PrinciplismUses key moral principles (e.g., autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice) to resolve conflicts.Deciding whether to perform surgery on a patient by balancing the principles of beneficence and autonomy.
UtilitarianismAims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number. Ethical decisions are made based on consequences.Deciding to allocate resources to patients who have the best chances of survival during a pandemic.
DeontologyFocuses on duties and rules. Decisions are made based on adherence to moral laws or rules, regardless of outcomes.A doctor refuses to euthanize a terminally ill patient because it violates the duty to preserve life, even though the patient is in extreme pain.

For more on ethical conflict resolution, visit American Medical Ethics

Principlism in Resolving Ethical Conflicts

Principlism is another widely accepted method, particularly in healthcare ethics. It draws on four central moral principles: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. This approach provides a structured framework for resolving ethical conflicts by balancing these principles.

For instance, in a medical context, the principle of autonomy might lead healthcare providers to respect a patient’s wish to refuse treatment, while the principle of beneficence pushes them to provide care that is in the patient’s best interest. The challenge, therefore, lies in balancing these often competing principles to arrive at an ethically sound decision.

Casuistry and Its Application

Casuistry, which dates back to ancient times, involves resolving moral conflicts by drawing comparisons to paradigm cases—cases that have been agreed upon as ethically clear. This approach is highly pragmatic and case-specific, focusing on real-life scenarios instead of abstract ethical theories.

In healthcare, casuistry is often used when medical professionals encounter cases that closely resemble previous ones. They can draw from past decisions and outcomes to inform current ethical dilemmas. While it lacks the universal application of other ethical theories, casuistry’s strength lies in its flexibility and adaptability.

Narrative Ethics: A Human-Centered Approach

Narrative ethics has become a compelling alternative for resolving ethical conflicts, especially in the field of nursing. This approach places the individual’s story at the center of ethical deliberation, aiming to uncover the personal values and meanings that shape decisions. It allows healthcare professionals to view patients as unique individuals, rather than as cases to be solved by rigid rules or principles.

Although narrative ethics lacks the theoretical rigor of principlism or deontology, it compensates by offering deep empathy and understanding. In many ways, it aligns with casuistry, which also emphasizes the importance of particular cases in ethical reasoning.

As highlighted by Montello (2014) and Meyer et al. (2020), narrative ethics enriches ethical deliberations by focusing on human stories. Nurses, in particular, find this approach consistent with their practice, as understanding the stories behind a patient’s life adds layers of meaning to care decisions.

Ethical Approaches in Practice: The Blended Model

Given that no single ethical approach can fully capture the complexities of every ethical dilemma, many professionals adopt a blended model. This model combines elements from multiple ethical theories to address conflicts more comprehensively.

For instance, a blended model might incorporate narrative ethics to consider the personal values and experiences of individuals, while also applying principlism to ensure that key ethical principles are respected. This blending allows for a more holistic and nuanced approach to conflict resolution.


FAQ: Ethical Approaches to Resolving Ethical Conflicts

Q: What are the most common ethical approaches to resolving conflicts?
A: The most common ethical approaches include narrative ethics, casuistry, principlism, deontology, and utilitarianism. Each approach offers a unique way to address ethical dilemmas based on different perspectives and values.

Q: Why is narrative ethics important in healthcare?
A: Narrative ethics is important because it emphasizes the individual stories of patients, allowing healthcare providers to make decisions based on personal values and experiences. This approach fosters empathy and a deeper understanding of ethical conflicts.

Q: What is the main difference between principlism and utilitarianism?
A: Principlism focuses on balancing four moral principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice), whereas utilitarianism aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people. While principlism is principle-based, utilitarianism is consequence-based.

Q: How can professionals use casuistry to resolve ethical conflicts?
A: Casuistry resolves ethical conflicts by drawing comparisons between the current situation and past paradigm cases. It helps professionals find practical solutions based on similar situations they have encountered before.

Q: Is it better to use one ethical approach or a combination of approaches?
A: In practice, professionals often find that using a combination of approaches provides the best results. A blended model allows them to draw on the strengths of different ethical theories, depending on the complexity of the ethical dilemma they face.

Post Disclaimer

General Disclaimer *

Professional Scope of Practice *

The information on this blog site is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified healthcare professional or licensed physician and is not medical advice. We encourage you to make healthcare decisions based on your research and partnership with a qualified healthcare professional.

Blog Information & Scope Discussions

Our information scope is limited to musculoskeletal, physical medicines, wellness, contributing etiological viscerosomatic disturbances within clinical presentations, associated somatovisceral reflex clinical dynamics, subluxation complexes, sensitive health issues, and/or functional medicine articles, topics, and discussions.

We provide and present clinical collaboration with specialists from various disciplines. Each specialist is governed by their professional scope of practice and their jurisdiction of licensure. We use functional health & wellness protocols to treat and support care for the injuries or disorders of the musculoskeletal system.

Our videos, posts, topics, subjects, and insights cover clinical matters, issues, and topics that relate to and directly or indirectly support our clinical scope of practice.*

Our office has reasonably attempted to provide supportive citations and has identified the relevant research studies or studies supporting our posts. We provide copies of supporting research studies that are available to regulatory boards and the public upon request.

We understand that we cover matters that require an additional explanation of how they may assist in a particular care plan or treatment protocol; therefore, to discuss the subject matter above further, please feel free to ask Dr. Alex Jimenez, DC, RN or contact us at 915-850-0900.

We are here to help you and your family.

Blessings

Dr. Alex Jimenez DC, MS-FNP, MSACP, RN*, CCST, IFMCP*, CIFM*, ATN*

email: support@chiromed.com

Licensed as a Registered Nurse (RN*) in Florida Plus 42 Multi-State Compact License
Florida License RN License # RN9617241 (Control No. 3558029)
Compact Status: Multi-State License: Authorized to Practice in 40 States*
Graduate with Honors: ICHS: MSN-FNP (Family Nurse Practitioner Program)
Degree Granted. Masters in Family Practice MSN Diploma (Cum Laude) *

Licensed as a Doctor of Chiropractic (DC) in Texas & New Mexico*
Texas DC License # TX5807, New Mexico DC License # NM-DC2182

Dr. Alex Jimenez DC, MSACP, MSN-FNP, RN* CIFM*, IFMCP*, ATN*, CCST
My Digital Business Card

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *