Chiropractic Techniques Explained For Disc Herniation & Disc Bulging

Unlock the potential of chiropractic care for pain management and improved physical well-being from disc herniation and disc bulging.

Understanding Disc Herniation and Disc Bulging: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide to Chiropractic Care and Spinal Decompression

Unlocking the Path to Recovery: Evidence-Based Chiropractic Solutions for Spinal Disc Disorders

According to Al Qaraghli and De Jesus (2023), back pain is one of the most common health issues impacting contemporary society, with 80% of people suffering at least one episode throughout their lifetime. Two of the most prevalent—yet usually misdiagnosed—causes of incapacitating pain among this wide range of spinal disorders are disc herniation and disc bulging. Understanding the clinical differences between neck, mid-back, and lower back pain, and the available evidence-based treatment options, especially chiropractic care and nonsurgical spinal decompression therapy, can help patients experiencing chronic pain radiating through these regions find long-lasting relief and functional restoration.

Understanding the Spinal Disc: Anatomy and Function

The human spine is a marvel of biological engineering, consisting of 24 vertebrae stacked on one another, separated by intervertebral discs that serve as sophisticated shock absorbers. These discs play multiple essential roles: they maintain height between vertebrae, absorb mechanical forces during movement and impact, facilitate spinal flexibility, and distribute biomechanical loads evenly throughout the spinal column (Al Qaraghli & De Jesus, 2023). Each intervertebral disc comprises two distinct structural components. The annulus fibrosus forms the tough, circular outer portion composed of 15 to 25 stacked sheets of highly organized fibrous connective tissue, predominantly type 1 collagen in the outer layers and type 2 collagen in the inner portions. Surrounding this protective shell lies the nucleus pulposus, a gel-like inner core consisting of a loose network of fibers suspended in a hydrophilic matrix. At birth, approximately 80% of disc composition consists of water, and proper hydration remains essential for optimal disc function throughout life (El Paso Chiropractor Blog, 2016). The structural integrity of healthy discs has often been compared to a jelly doughnut—a resilient outer ring containing a soft, gelatinous center. This unique composition enables discs to evenly distribute forces and pressures applied to the spine during daily activities, maintaining spinal stability while permitting controlled movement.

Disc Herniation vs. Disc Bulging: Critical Distinctions and Similarities

While disc herniation and disc bulging both involve displacement of disc material beyond normal anatomical boundaries, understanding their fundamental differences proves critical for appropriate clinical management and patient education.

Disc Bulging: Contained Disc Displacement

A disc bulge (also termed disc prolapse) occurs when the nucleus pulposus presses against the annulus fibrosus wall, causing the disc to protrude outward beyond its usual borders. Critically, in a bulging disc, the outer annular fibers remain intact—the gel-like nucleus stays fully contained within the disc structure, even though the entire disc extends beyond its normal space (Mayo Clinic, 2024). This condition typically affects at least 25% to 50% of the disc’s circumference and involves only the outer layer of tough cartilage (El Paso Chiropractor Blog, 2016).

The bulging disc can still compress surrounding neural structures, including spinal nerves and the spinal cord, potentially causing pain, numbness, tingling, and functional limitations. However, because the disc material remains contained, symptoms are often milder than with herniated discs, unless significant nerve compression occurs (Neurosurgery One, 2025).

Disc Herniation: Rupture and Extrusion

In contrast, a disc herniation (also called disc extrusion, ruptured disc, or slipped disc) develops when the tough outer annulus fibrosus develops a crack or tear, allowing the soft nucleus pulposus to squeeze through the opening and protrude into the spinal canal (Mayo Clinic, 2024). The herniated material can spread to adjacent structures, including the spinal cord and spinal nerve roots, often compressing these delicate tissues and triggering a cascade of symptoms (El Paso Chiropractor Blog, 2016).

When disc material herniates, two distinct pathological mechanisms contribute to pain generation. First, mechanical compression of neural structures directly irritates and damages nerve tissue. Second, the chemical composition of the nucleus pulposus itself proves highly inflammatory—when exposed to the immune system, these materials trigger significant inflammatory responses characterized by swelling, pain, and immune cell infiltration (Cosamalón-Gan et al., 2021).

Similarities Between Disc Conditions

Despite their structural differences, disc herniation and disc bulging share several important characteristics:

• Common Symptom Patterns: Both conditions can produce identical or nearly identical symptoms, including localized back or neck pain, radiating pain into extremities (radiculopathy), numbness and tingling sensations, muscle weakness, and limited range of motion (Neurosurgeons of New Jersey, 2023).
• Age-Related Degeneration: Both conditions typically arise from the spine’s natural degenerative process. As individuals age, spinal discs progressively dehydrate, becoming stiffer, more fragile, and less capable of adjusting to compression and mechanical stress. This degeneration represents the primary underlying cause for most disc complications (El Paso Chiropractor Blog, 2016).
• Nerve Compression Mechanisms: Whether bulging or herniated, displaced disc material can impinge on spinal nerve roots or the spinal cord, triggering nerve irritation, inflammation, and the characteristic pain patterns associated with these conditions (Al Qaraghli & De Jesus, 2023).
• Asymptomatic Presentations: Remarkably, many individuals harbor disc bulges or herniations without experiencing any symptoms whatsoever. These conditions are frequently discovered incidentally during imaging studies performed for unrelated medical issues (Mayo Clinic, 2024).

Regional Manifestations: How Disc Disorders Affect the Cervical, Thoracic, and Lumbar Spine

Disc herniation and bulging can develop throughout the spinal column, though certain regions are more vulnerable. The clinical presentation, symptom patterns, and functional impairments vary significantly depending on the spinal region affected.

Cervical Spine Disc Disorders

The cervical spine, comprising seven vertebrae in the neck, is the second most common site of symptomatic disc herniation. The most frequently affected levels are C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7, with C6-C7 most likely to herniate in the cervical region (Spine-health, 2019).

Clinical Manifestations: Cervical disc herniation typically produces neck pain located toward the back or side of the neck, ranging from mild tenderness to sharp, burning sensations (Spine-health, 2019). Radicular pain—characterized by electric shock-like or hot sensations—commonly radiates from the neck down through the shoulder, arm, hand, and fingers. The specific distribution of symptoms depends on which nerve root suffers compression:

• C5 nerve root (C4-C5 herniation): Pain and tingling radiating to the shoulder, with potential weakness in the deltoid muscle
• C6 nerve root (C5-C6 herniation): Pain, tingling, and numbness affecting the thumb side of the hand, with weakness in the biceps and wrist extensors
• C7 nerve root (C6-C7 herniation): Symptoms extending to the middle finger, with triceps weakness and finger extensor dysfunction
• C8 nerve root (C7-T1 herniation): Pain and numbness in the pinky side of the hand, with handgrip weakness

Cervical herniated discs can also trigger cervical myelopathy when disc material compresses the spinal cord itself. This serious condition produces bilateral symptoms including numbness, weakness, balance disturbances (ataxia), hyperreflexia, and potential urinary incontinence. Chronic myelopathy may progress insidiously, sometimes delaying diagnosis as patients attribute symptoms to normal aging (Kamran Aghayev, 2025).

Thoracic Spine Disc Disorders

Thoracic disc herniations represent the rarest form of symptomatic disc pathology, with an estimated incidence of approximately one in one million per year, accounting for only 0.25% to 0.75% of total symptomatic spinal disc herniations (BCMJ, 2019). Despite this rarity, thoracic disc disorders present unique diagnostic challenges due to their atypical symptom presentations.

• Clinical Manifestations: Thoracic herniated discs produce three distinct clinical patterns (Barrow Neurological Institute, 2025):
• Radiculopathy (affecting approximately 52% of symptomatic patients): Mid-back pain that may wrap around the chest in a band-like distribution, corresponding to the dermatomal pattern of the affected nerve root. Patients often describe sensations of a strap tightening around their chest. Pain may also manifest as numbness, pressure sensations, or generalized discomfort rather than classic pain.
• Myelopathy (affecting approximately 70% of symptomatic patients): Spinal cord compression producing difficulty walking, progressive lower extremity weakness and numbness, wide-based gait, increased muscle tone and clonus, hyperreflexia in lower extremities, and occasional bowel dysfunction.
• Atypical extraspinal symptoms: Thoracic disc herniations frequently produce misleading symptoms, including nausea, emesis, chest tightness, gastrointestinal complaints, chronic constipation, buttock and leg burning pain, and urinary frequency—often leading to extensive workups for cardiac, pulmonary, or gastrointestinal disorders before the correct diagnosis emerges (Physio-pedia, 2023).

The most commonly affected thoracic levels include T7-T8, T8-T9, and T11-T12, with disc pathologies identified in approximately 18% of thoracic intervertebral disc levels among symptomatic patients (Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 2019).

Lumbar Spine Disc Disorders

The lumbar spine represents the most common location for disc herniation and bulging, with approximately 95% of lumbar disc herniations occurring at the L4-L5 or L5-S1 levels. Lumbar disc herniation affects 5 to 20 individuals per 1,000 adults annually, with peak prevalence occurring in the third to fifth decades of life and a male-to-female ratio of 2:1 (Al Qaraghli & De Jesus, 2023).

• Clinical Manifestations: Lumbar disc disorders typically produce:
• Low back pain: The primary symptom, arising from pressure exerted by herniated disc material on the posterior longitudinal ligament and local inflammation. The pain is often mechanical, worsening with movement, prolonged sitting, straining, coughing, and sneezing (Al Qaraghli & De Jesus, 2023).
• Radiculopathy (sciatica): When disc material compresses lumbar nerve roots, pain radiates into the buttocks, thighs, calves, and feet, following specific dermatomal patterns:

• L4 nerve root (L4-L5 herniation): Pain radiating to the anterior thigh and medial leg, with weakness in hip flexion/adduction and knee extension, plus diminished patellar reflex
• L5 nerve root (L5-S1 herniation): Pain extending to the buttock, lateral thigh, lateral calf, dorsum of foot, and great toe, with weakness in foot dorsiflexion, great toe extension, and foot inversion/eversion
• S1 nerve root (S1-S2 herniation): Sacral/buttock pain radiating to the posterolateral thigh, calf, and lateral/plantar foot, with weakness in plantar flexion and diminished Achilles reflex
• Neurological deficits —sensory abnormalities (numbness, tingling), motor weakness, muscle atrophy in chronic cases, and altered reflexes — characterize nerve root compression. Severe central herniations may produce cauda equina syndrome, a surgical emergency characterized by saddle anesthesia, bowel/bladder incontinence, and progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness (Al Qaraghli & De Jesus, 2023).

Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors: Creating Overlapping Risk Profiles for Back Pain

While genetic factors contribute significantly to disc degeneration and herniation susceptibility, environmental and occupational exposures create substantial additional risk, often producing overlapping risk profiles that compound individual vulnerability to back pain across all spinal regions.

Occupational Physical Demands

Heavy physical workload and occupations requiring strenuous effort are associated most strongly with lumbar disc herniation risk. Research examining risk factors for lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy identified occupation—particularly heavy labor—among the most robust risk factors, with certain professions showing risk ratios up to 6.0 (Dynamic Disc Designs, 2024).

Specific occupational activities that increase disc herniation risk include:

• Repetitive lifting, bending, and twisting: Cumulative exposure to lifting heavy weights, forward bending, and rotational movements significantly increases lumbar disc herniation risk (Risk Factors Study, 2021)
• Prolonged sitting: Sedentary work increases the risk of disc degeneration by exerting sustained compression loads on the spine during extended sitting. Sitting increases intradiscal pressure by approximately 40% compared to standing, intensifying mechanical stress on already vulnerable discs (Al Qaraghli & De Jesus, 2023)
• Extended work hours: Working periods exceeding 8 hours consistently and experiencing high workplace stress levels are both associated with elevated disc herniation risk (Spine-health, 2024)
• Whole-body vibration: Occupations involving prolonged exposure to vibration (truck drivers, heavy equipment operators) accelerate disc degeneration

Built Environment and Healthy Building Determinants

Emerging evidence indicates that indoor environmental quality and healthy building determinants significantly influence the risk of back and neck pain. A systematic review examining relationships between healthy building determinants and back/neck pain found evidence generally supporting that as healthy building determinants worsen—including poor air quality, inadequate ventilation, dust exposure, suboptimal lighting, moisture problems, excessive noise, thermal discomfort, and poor water quality—the risk of back and neck pain increases (PMC, 2022).

Given that people spend more than 90% of their time indoors, the built environment where most back and neck pain episodes occur deserves greater attention in prevention strategies. Poor environmental factors, including noise, dust, gases, fumes, and poor air quality, were significantly associated with increased back pain risk in both men and women across multiple studies (PMC, 2022).

Lifestyle and Health-Related Risk Factors

Beyond occupational exposures, numerous lifestyle factors create overlapping vulnerability:

• Age and degeneration: While aging itself remains unavoidable, the natural degenerative cascade—characterized by reduced water content, increased type 1 collagen ratios in the nucleus pulposus, destruction of extracellular matrix, and upregulated inflammatory pathways—progresses throughout adult life, with disc herniation most prevalent between ages 30-50 (Al Qaraghli & De Jesus, 2023).
• Obesity and excess weight: Elevated body mass index dramatically increases disc herniation risk by placing excessive mechanical load on the spine, accelerating disc degeneration and making herniation more likely. Excess body fat, particularly around the chest and abdomen, intensifies biomechanical stress on the lower back while promoting systemic inflammation (Spine-health, 2024).
• Nicotine use: Smoking, vaping, and tobacco chewing disrupt nutrient flow to intervertebral discs, inhibit nucleus pulposus cell growth, and reduce collagen synthesis—all accelerating disc degeneration (Spine-health, 2024).
• Sedentary lifestyle: Physical inactivity leads to weak core muscles, poor posture, and reduced flexibility, all of which increase stress on spinal discs. Regular low-impact exercise strengthens muscles supporting the spine and improves overall spinal health (Leucadia Chiropractic, 2025).
• Improper lifting techniques: Using the back instead of legs when lifting, twisting while lifting, or attempting to carry excessive weight places dangerous pressure on the spine, potentially triggering acute herniation in susceptible individuals.
• Cardiovascular risk factors: Surprisingly, high cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, and family history of coronary disease all associate with higher lumbar disc herniation risk, particularly in women, suggesting metabolic health plays important roles in disc pathology (Dynamic Disc Designs, 2024).

Genetic Susceptibility and Gene-Environment Interactions

Twin studies demonstrate that both genetic and environmental factors contribute substantially to disc degeneration and back pain. Genetic factors appear to influence disc narrowing and degeneration—key pathways through which genes influence the development of back pain (FYZICAL, 2006). However, environmental factors interact with genetic predisposition, creating complex risk profiles where occupational exposures, lifestyle choices, and built environment quality either amplify or mitigate underlying genetic vulnerability.

Research on Finnish twins revealed that approximately 41% of the total variance in childhood low back pain could be attributed to shared environmental factors within families, while 59% stemmed from unique environmental factors, with genetic factors playing at most a minor role in pediatric populations (PMC, 2008). This underscores the critical importance of identifying and modifying environmental risk factors to prevent disc pathology across the lifespan.

The Inflammatory Cascade: Biochemical Mediators of Disc-Related Pain

Understanding disc herniation requires moving beyond purely mechanical models of nerve compression to appreciate the complex inflammatory processes that amplify and perpetuate pain. Until fairly recently, sciatic pain and radiculopathy associated with lumbar disc herniation were attributed exclusively to mechanical compression of nerve roots. However, mounting evidence from immunology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular biology studies indicates that herniated disc tissue is biologically active, expressing numerous inflammatory mediators that play central roles in pain generation (Cosamalón-Gan et al., 2021).

Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines

Herniated and degenerated discs demonstrate markedly elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including:

• Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β): A master regulator of inflammatory responses that stimulates production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), promoting extracellular matrix breakdown and disc degeneration. IL-1β also induces expression of additional inflammatory mediators and chemokines (PMC, 2013).
• Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α): Works synergistically with IL-1β to promote matrix degradation, increase production of catabolic enzymes, and stimulate inflammatory pathways. TNF-α directly sensitizes nociceptors, lowering pain thresholds and increasing pain sensitivity (PMC, 2013).
• Interleukin-6 (IL-6): Elevated in degenerated and herniated discs, IL-6 contributes to chronic inflammatory states and correlates with pain intensity. Recent research demonstrates that disc herniation severity associates with circulating IL-6 levels, with this relationship particularly pronounced in patients with chronic symptoms (NYP Advances, 2020).
• Interleukin-8 (IL-8): A potent chemotactic factor that recruits neutrophils to sites of disc herniation. Co-neutralization of IL-8 and TNF-α significantly improved mechanical hyperalgesia in experimental models (PMC, 2013).
• Interleukin-17 (IL-17): Plays important roles in recruiting T-cells and macrophages and activating glial and astrocytic cells during nerve injury and subsequent neuropathic pain. IL-17 levels show significant elevation in herniated versus merely degenerated discs (PMC, 2013).

Chemokines and Immune Cell Recruitment

Beyond structural damage, inflammatory cytokines stimulate disc cells to produce chemotactic factors that recruit immune cells—including macrophages, neutrophils, and T cells—to the disc and surrounding tissues. Analysis of herniated discs reveals elevated levels of multiple chemokines, including:

• Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1, CCL2)
• CCL3, CCL4, CCL5
• MCP-3, MCP-4
• CXCL10

Expression of CCL3 correlates positively with degeneration grade and is higher in herniated tissue compared with degenerate but contained discs. By regulating chemokine expression, inflammatory cytokines promote C-C chemokine receptor type 1 (CCR1)-dependent macrophage migration, thereby establishing a self-perpetuating inflammatory cycle critical to pain-generating pathways (PMC, 2013).

Autoimmune Responses

Inflammation in disc herniation stems not only from chemical irritation by bioactive substances released from the nucleus pulposus but also from autoimmune responses against disc tissue itself. The nucleus pulposus, normally sequestered from the immune system, becomes recognized as foreign when herniation exposes it to immune surveillance. This triggers antibody production and T-cell-mediated responses that amplify local inflammation (Cosamalón-Gan et al., 2021).

Clinical Implications of Inflammatory Mechanisms

This biochemical understanding carries profound clinical implications. First, it explains why some patients experience severe pain despite relatively minor disc herniations—individual variations in inflammatory responses may prove more important than herniation size alone. Second, it validates treatment approaches targeting inflammation, including judicious use of anti-inflammatory medications and interventions like epidural steroid injections. Third, it suggests that therapies that promote the resolution of inflammation and support tissue healing—such as chiropractic care and spinal decompression—may address root causes rather than merely manage symptoms.

Clinical Rationale for Chiropractic Care in Disc Herniation and Bulging

Chiropractic care has emerged as a primary conservative treatment modality for patients suffering from disc herniation and bulge, supported by growing evidence demonstrating significant clinical benefits. The clinical rationale for chiropractic intervention in disc pathology rests on multiple therapeutic mechanisms that address both mechanical dysfunction and inflammatory processes.

Mechanisms of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation

Chiropractic spinal manipulation—characterized by high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) controlled forces applied to specific spinal segments—produces multiple beneficial effects in patients with disc disorders:

• Restoration of spinal alignment and mobility: Spinal manipulation corrects vertebral misalignments (subluxations) that may contribute to abnormal biomechanical stress on intervertebral discs. By restoring proper spinal alignment, manipulation reduces asymmetric loading that accelerates disc degeneration (El Paso Chiropractor Blog, 2016).
• Reduction of intradiscal pressure: Properly executed spinal manipulation may temporarily reduce pressure within affected discs, potentially facilitating retraction of herniated material and reducing compression on adjacent neural structures.
• Improvement of spinal joint function: Manipulation increases range of motion in restricted spinal segments, reducing mechanical irritation of surrounding tissues and improving overall spinal biomechanics.
• Modulation of pain perception: Spinal manipulation activates mechanoreceptors and produces neurophysiological effects that may modulate pain perception via gate-control mechanisms and descending pain-inhibition pathways.
• Anti-inflammatory effects: Emerging evidence suggests that spinal manipulation may influence inflammatory processes, potentially reducing local cytokine production and promoting the resolution of inflammation.

Clinical Outcomes Evidence for Chiropractic Care

Multiple high-quality studies document the effectiveness of chiropractic spinal manipulation for disc herniation and bulging across spinal regions:

Lumbar Disc Herniation: A landmark prospective cohort study published in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics followed 148 patients aged 18-65 with low back pain, leg pain, and MRI-confirmed lumbar disc herniation treated with high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation (Leemann et al., 2014). Outcomes proved remarkable:

• At 3 months, 90.5% of patients reported “improvement” on global impression of change scales
• At 1 year, 88.0% maintained “improved” status
• Among chronic patients (symptoms >3 months), 81.8% reported improvement, increasing to 89.2% at 1 year
• Both acute and chronic patients demonstrated significant improvements in numerical rating scale scores for low back pain, leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index scores at all follow-up points (2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months)
• No adverse events were reported throughout the study period

The high success rates among chronic patients are particularly noteworthy, as this population typically shows poorer responses to conservative interventions. The sustained improvements at one-year follow-up indicate that chiropractic manipulation produces lasting benefits rather than merely temporary symptom relief.

Cervical Disc Herniation: Research from Zurich, Switzerland, examined 50 patients aged 18-65 with MRI-confirmed cervical disc herniation treated with chiropractic spinal manipulation at frequencies of 3-5 sessions weekly initially, reducing to 1-3 sessions weekly until symptom resolution (SSPT Chiropractic, 2024). Results demonstrated progressive improvement:

• At 2 weeks, 55% of participants reported improvement
• At 1 month, 68.8% showed improvement
• At 3 months, 85.4% experienced favorable outcomes
• Even among chronic cervical disc herniation patients, 76% reported beneficial effects, including reduced neck and arm pain

Another study specifically examining patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc herniation and concomitant sacroiliac joint hypomobility found that five sessions of lumbar and sacroiliac joint manipulation over a 2-week period produced significant improvements in both back and leg pain intensity and functional disability, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (Shokri et al., 2018).

Comparative Effectiveness: Research comparing chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) with other care modalities for newly diagnosed lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal radiculopathy found that patients receiving CSMT demonstrated significantly reduced odds of requiring lumbar discectomy surgery through 2-year follow-up compared to those receiving other care approaches (BMJ Open, 2022). This suggests that chiropractic care may help many patients avoid surgical intervention while achieving satisfactory functional outcomes.

Dr. Alexander Jimenez’s Integrative Approach

Dr. Alexander Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, exemplifies the modern integrative chiropractic practitioner, combining advanced clinical expertise with comprehensive diagnostic evaluation to optimize patient outcomes. As both a board-certified Doctor of Chiropractic and Family Practice Nurse Practitioner practicing in El Paso, Texas, Dr. Jimenez brings a unique dual-scope perspective to treating complex spinal disorders, including disc herniation and bulging. Dr. Jimenez’s clinical approach emphasizes thorough diagnostic evaluation utilizing advanced imaging modalities—including MRI and other radiological studies—to precisely characterize disc pathology before initiating treatment. This imaging-guided approach ensures that manipulation techniques are appropriately tailored to each patient’s specific disc lesion type, location, and severity. As noted on his clinical website (dralexjimenez.com), Dr. Jimenez focuses on treating patients with “complex herniated discs” using evidence-based protocols that integrate chiropractic manipulation, functional medicine principles, nutritional optimization, and rehabilitation exercises. His dual training enables comprehensive evaluation of patients from both musculoskeletal and medical perspectives, identifying underlying metabolic, inflammatory, or systemic factors that may contribute to disc degeneration and impaired healing. Dr. Jimenez emphasizes that proper patient selection proves critical—when patients present with conditions better suited for alternative treatments or specialist referral, he ensures they receive appropriate care from the most qualified providers. The integration of functional medicine assessment tools, including detailed evaluations of genetics, lifestyle factors, environmental exposures, nutritional status, and psychological/emotional factors, enables Dr. Jimenez to address the root causes of disc pathology rather than merely treating symptoms. This comprehensive approach aligns with emerging evidence demonstrating that metabolic health, inflammatory status, and environmental factors significantly influence disc degeneration progression and healing potential.

Spinal Decompression in Depth- Video

Nonsurgical Spinal Decompression: Mechanism, Evidence, and Clinical Application

Nonsurgical spinal decompression therapy (NSDT) represents an advanced evolution of traditional traction therapy, utilizing sophisticated computer-controlled systems to create negative intradiscal pressure that facilitates disc healing and symptom resolution. Understanding the distinctions between NSDT and conventional traction proves essential for appreciating this intervention’s unique therapeutic potential.

Mechanism of Action: Creating Negative Intradiscal Pressure

NSDT operates through a precisely controlled biomechanical process fundamentally different from traditional traction:

• Specialized positioning: Patients are positioned on a computer-controlled decompression table with the spine properly aligned and supported. Harnesses secure the upper body (chest and shoulders) while a separate harness attaches to the pelvis or lower body.
• Computer-guided distraction: Unlike conventional traction that applies a constant pulling force, NSDT employs a sophisticated algorithm that gradually increases and decreases distraction force in cyclical patterns. This intermittent loading prevents reflexive muscle guarding, which limits the effectiveness of traditional traction (Hill DT Solutions, 2024).
• Negative intradiscal pressure generation: The controlled distraction force creates a vacuum effect within targeted intervertebral discs. Research measuring intradiscal pressure during NSDT using pressure transducers inserted into the L4-L5 disc space demonstrated that decompression therapy can lower pressure in the nucleus pulposus to below -100 mmHg, compared to standard progressive traction achieving only -40 mmHg (compared to -75 mmHg resting supine) (Hill DT Solutions, 2024).
• Disc material retraction: This sustained negative pressure may facilitate retraction of herniated or bulging nucleus pulposus material away from compressed neural structures. The vacuum effect theoretically “pulls” extruded disc material back toward its normal position within the disc space.
• Enhanced nutrient influx: Negative intradiscal pressure promotes increased fluid exchange, drawing oxygen, nutrients, and hydration into degenerated discs. This enhanced nutrient delivery may support disc cell metabolism and tissue repair (Dr. DiGrado, 2024).
• Spinal joint decompression: The distraction force increases the width of the intervertebral foramen, reducing pressure on exiting nerve roots and facet joints, thereby contributing to pain relief independent of effects on the disc itself.

Critical Distinction from Traditional Traction

The fundamental advantage of NSDT over conventional traction lies in its ability to overcome the muscle guarding reflex. When traditional traction applies sudden or sustained pulling forces, paraspinal muscles reflexively contract to protect the spine from perceived threat. This muscle contraction increases internal disc pressure and limits the therapeutic effect (Choi et al., 2022).NSDT systems employ gradual force application with intermittent relaxation phases that prevent this protective muscle contraction. The computer continuously monitors resistance and adjusts force application in real time, maintaining the spine in a relaxed state while delivering far greater decompressive forces than traditional traction can achieve. This creates what researchers describe as a “zero-gravitation” state in targeted discs (Choi et al., 2022).

Evidence for NSDT Effectiveness

A rigorous randomized controlled trial published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice provides compelling evidence for the effectiveness of NSDT in treating subacute lumbar disc herniation (Choi et al., 2022). This study enrolled 60 patients with subacute lumbar herniated intervertebral disc, randomizing them to either:

• Decompression group (n=30): Received 10 NSDT sessions over 8 weeks (twice weekly for 2 weeks, then once weekly for 6 weeks), with distraction force starting at half body weight minus 5 kg and increasing by 1 kg per session
• Nondecompression group (n=30): Received identical positioning and session frequency but with zero distraction force (sham treatment)

Results demonstrated significant advantages for the decompression group:

Pain outcomes:

• Lower leg pain intensity at 2 months (p=0.028)
• Significant reductions in low back and leg pain from baseline to 3 months in both groups (p<0.001), though between-group differences in back pain did not reach significance

Functional outcomes:

• Significantly lower Korean Oswestry Disability Index scores at 2 months (p=0.023) and 3 months (p=0.019)

MRI-documented structural changes:

• Herniation index decreased by 27.6±27.5% in the decompression group versus only 7.1±24.9% in the control group (p=0.017)
• 26.9% of decompression patients versus 0% of control patients achieved >50% reduction in herniation index (p=0.031)
• 42.3% of decompression patients achieved ≥30% herniation reduction versus 17.6% of controls

These findings prove groundbreaking—this study represents the first randomized controlled trial to document that NSDT produces measurable reductions in disc herniation volume as confirmed by follow-up MRI, while simultaneously improving pain and function. The fact that actual structural healing occurred rather than merely symptomatic improvement suggests that NSDT addresses the underlying pathology. Additional research supports these findings. A retrospective cohort study examining adults with chronic low back pain attributed to disc herniation or discogenic pain who underwent 6-week NSDT protocols via the DRX9000 system found significant correlations between disc height restoration and pain reduction (Apfel et al., 2010). Low back pain decreased from 6.2±2.2 to 1.6±2.3 (p<0.001) while disc height increased from 7.5±1.7mm to 8.8±1.7mm (p<0.001), with these variables showing significant correlation (r=0.36, p=0.044). Long-term follow-up studies demonstrate sustained benefits. Research tracking patients 4 years after completing NSDT protocols found that 52% maintained pain levels of zero, 91% resumed normal daily activities, and over 80% achieved 50% or greater pain reduction compared to pre-treatment baselines (Pain Free Charleston, 2004).

NSDT Treatment Protocols

Typical NSDT treatment courses involve:

• Session frequency: 10-20 sessions over 4-8 weeks, with initial sessions typically scheduled 2-3 times weekly, reducing to 1-2 times weekly as improvement occurs
• Session duration: 20-30 minutes per session
• Force parameters: Distraction force is individualized based on patient body weight, disc level targeted, and tolerance, typically starting at conservative levels (40-50% body weight) and gradually progressing
• Positioning: Supine positioning with flexed knees for lumbar protocols; prone or supine with cervical harness for cervical protocols
• Cycle patterns: Alternating distraction and relaxation phases (commonly 60 seconds of tension, 30 seconds of relaxation) to prevent muscle guarding
• Adjunctive therapies: Many protocols combine NSDT with complementary treatments, including cold/heat therapy, electrical stimulation, therapeutic exercise, and nutritional support to optimize outcomes

Safety and Contraindications

NSDT demonstrates excellent safety profiles when appropriately applied. The randomized controlled trial by Choi and colleagues reported zero adverse events throughout the study period (Choi et al., 2022). Similarly, the large prospective cohort study by Leemann and colleagues involving 148 patients receiving chiropractic manipulation for MRI-confirmed disc herniation reported no adverse events (Leemann et al., 2014).

However, certain contraindications to NSDT must be respected:

Absolute contraindications:

• Pregnancy
• Fracture
• Tumor
• Abdominal aortic aneurysm
• Advanced osteoporosis
• Cauda equina syndrome requiring emergency surgery
• Severe spinal instability

Relative contraindications:

• Prior spinal surgery with hardware
• Severe disc degeneration with >50% height loss
• Sequestrated disc fragments
• Severe spinal stenosis
• Extreme obesity is limiting proper positioning

Proper patient selection, thorough clinical examination, and careful review of imaging studies by qualified practitioners ensure NSDT is applied to appropriate candidates while avoiding potential complications.

Integrating Chiropractic Care and Spinal Decompression: Complementary Approaches

For many patients with disc herniation and bulging, optimal outcomes emerge from integrating multiple conservative therapies rather than relying on single interventions. Chiropractic spinal manipulation and NSDT offer complementary mechanisms that address different aspects of disc pathology: 

• Chiropractic manipulation primarily restores spinal joint mobility, corrects vertebral misalignments, modulates pain through neurophysiological mechanisms, and may influence local inflammatory processes. It proves particularly effective for acute presentations and when joint dysfunction accompanies disc pathology.
• NSDT specifically targets the disc itself, creating negative intradiscal pressure that facilitates disc material retraction, promotes nutrient influx, and directly decompresses neural structures. It excels in cases where significant disc herniation or advanced degeneration requires sustained decompressive forces.

When combined, these approaches provide:

• Comprehensive address of both joint dysfunction and disc pathology
• Multiple mechanisms for pain relief and functional restoration
• Options for tailoring treatment intensity to individual patient tolerance
• Complementary effects that may accelerate healing beyond either therapy alone

Dr. Jimenez’s integrative approach exemplifies this comprehensive strategy, combining chiropractic adjustments with spinal decompression, functional medicine interventions, nutritional optimization, therapeutic exercise, and patient education to address all contributors to disc pathology and optimize healing potential.

Patient Selection and Prognostic Factors

Not all patients with disc herniation or bulging require or benefit equally from chiropractic care and spinal decompression. Understanding prognostic factors helps identify ideal candidates:

Favorable prognostic indicators:

• Acute to subacute symptom duration (4 weeks to 3 months)
• First episode of disc-related pain
• Absence of progressive neurological deficits
• Contained disc herniations (protrusions, extrusions) rather than sequestrations
• Younger age (generally <65 years)
• Absence of significant comorbidities
• High motivation and compliance with treatment protocols
• Adequate disc height preservation on imaging

Factors suggesting need for alternative or adjunctive interventions:

• Cauda equina syndrome symptoms (surgical emergency)
• Progressive motor weakness or paralysis
• Symptoms lasting >12 months without improvement
• Sequestrated disc fragments
• Severe central stenosis
• Failed conservative treatment trials
• Significant psychological distress or catastrophizing
• Major comorbidities affecting healing capacity

Even among chronic patients, evidence suggests substantial benefit from chiropractic care and NSDT, with the Leemann study demonstrating 89.2% of chronic lumbar disc herniation patients reporting improvement at 1-year follow-up after chiropractic manipulation (Leemann et al., 2014).

Conclusion: Evidence-Based Hope for Disc Pathology

The evidence presented in this extensive review leads to an unequivocal conclusion: chiropractic care and nonsurgical spinal decompression therapy are evidence-based and effective treatment modalities for patients with disc herniation and disc bulging in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine regions. For patients enduring the debilitating pain, functional limitations, and quality-of-life impairments linked to disc pathology, these conservative interventions present hope based on robust scientific evidence. Studies consistently show that carefully selected patients who receive chiropractic spinal manipulation experience clinically significant improvements in pain, disability, and overall function. Depending on the patient’s characteristics and outcome measures, the success rates range from 76% to over 90%. Incredibly, these benefits last, as shown by follow-ups one year later and beyond. NSDT adds a powerful tool that can make measurable structural changes, such as a real decrease in disc herniation volume confirmed by MRI, as well as relieve symptoms. The capacity to record disc healing, rather than solely symptom management, signifies a transformative advancement in conservative disc care. The clinical insights from practitioners such as Dr. Alexander Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, who combine advanced diagnostic evaluation, dual-scope clinical expertise, and comprehensive treatment protocols, show how modern chiropractic practice has moved beyond the limits of the past. Integrative approaches address the root causes of disc pathology while supporting the body’s natural healing abilities by combining spinal manipulation, decompression therapy, functional medicine principles, nutritional optimization, and patient education. Environmental and occupational risk factors generate overlapping vulnerability profiles that exacerbate genetic predisposition to disc degeneration. Recognizing these modifiable factors—such as workplace ergonomics, physical demands, built environment quality, obesity, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, and metabolic health—facilitates comprehensive prevention and treatment strategies that transcend mere symptom management. Understanding the inflammatory cascade that causes disc-related pain, which involves complex interactions among pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, immune cell infiltration, and autoimmune responses, provides a mechanistic rationale for treatments that focus on reducing inflammation and healing tissue rather than just blocking pain signals. The evidence examined here provides genuine hope for significant recovery for the millions of individuals experiencing disc-related back and neck pain through conservative, nonsurgical approaches. Not every patient will achieve total resolution, and some may ultimately necessitate surgical intervention; however, the vast majority can anticipate considerable improvement through appropriately administered chiropractic care and spinal decompression therapy.

Important Medical Disclaimer and Serious Note to Readers

THIS ARTICLE IS INTENDED FOR INFORMATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL ADVICE, DIAGNOSIS, OR TREATMENT RECOMMENDATION. 

The information presented in this article, while based on peer-reviewed scientific literature and clinical evidence, does not substitute for professional medical evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Disc herniation, disc bulging, and related spinal conditions can produce serious complications, including permanent neurological damage, paralysis, bowel and bladder dysfunction, and chronic pain syndromes if inappropriately managed.

DO NOT ATTEMPT TO SELF-DIAGNOSE OR SELF-TREAT DISC-RELATED CONDITIONS. If you are experiencing back pain, neck pain, radiating pain into extremities, numbness, tingling, weakness, or any other symptoms potentially related to spinal disc pathology, seek immediate evaluation from qualified healthcare professionals.

CERTAIN SYMPTOMS CONSTITUTE MEDICAL EMERGENCIES requiring immediate emergency department evaluation, including:

• Sudden onset of bowel or bladder incontinence or retention
• Progressive lower extremity weakness or paralysis
• Saddle anesthesia (numbness in the groin/inner thigh region)
• Severe pain unresponsive to conservative measures
• Symptoms following significant trauma

Chiropractic care and spinal decompression therapy, while generally safe when appropriately applied, carry potential risks and contraindications. These interventions should be performed only by licensed, qualified practitioners after thorough clinical examination and review of appropriate imaging studies. Improper application of spinal manipulation or decompression therapy can potentially worsen disc herniation, cause neurological damage, or result in other serious complications. The treatment outcomes and success rates cited in this article represent average findings from clinical studies and should not be interpreted as guarantees of individual outcomes. Individual results vary based on numerous factors, including age, overall health status, severity and duration of disc pathology, presence of comorbidities, lifestyle factors, and compliance with treatment protocols.

Before initiating any treatment for disc-related conditions, patients should:

1. Undergo a comprehensive evaluation by qualified healthcare providers
2. Obtain appropriate imaging studies (MRI, CT, or X-ray as indicated)
3. Discuss all treatment options, including risks, benefits, and alternatives
4. Ensure practitioners are properly licensed and credentialed
5. Verify that their specific condition is appropriate for conservative management
6. Understand when surgical intervention may be necessary

References to Dr. Alexander Jimenez and his clinical approaches are provided for illustrative purposes, demonstrating integrative treatment models and should not be construed as specific endorsements or treatment recommendations. Patients seeking care should independently research practitioners’ credentials, experience, and patient outcomes. The authors and publishers of this article disclaim all liability for any adverse outcomes, complications, or damages resulting from the application of information contained herein. Readers assume all responsibility and risk for decisions made regarding their healthcare and treatment choices. This article addresses complex medical conditions requiring individualized assessment and treatment planning. What proves safe and effective for one patient may be inappropriate or dangerous for another. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals for personalized medical advice specific to your individual circumstances. If you are currently experiencing a medical emergency, call emergency services (911 in the United States) immediately. Do not delay seeking emergency care while researching conservative treatment options. By continuing to read and apply information from this article, you acknowledge understanding and accepting this disclaimer and assume full responsibility for your healthcare decisions.

References

• Al Qaraghli, M. I., & De Jesus, O. (2023). Lumbar disc herniation. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560878/
• Apfel, C. C., Cakmakkaya, O. S., Martin, W., Richmond, C., Macario, A., George, E., Schaefer, M., & Pergolizzi, J. V. (2010). Restoration of disk height through non-surgical spinal decompression is associated with decreased discogenic low back pain: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-155
• Barrow Neurological Institute. (2025). Herniated thoracic disc – causes, symptoms, treatments. https://www.barrowneuro.org/condition/thoracic-disc-herniation/
• BCMJ. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of thoracic disc herniation. BC Medical Journal, 61(10). https://bcmj.org/worksafebc/diagnosis-and-treatment-thoracic-disc-herniation
• BMJ Open. (2022). Association between chiropractic spinal manipulation and lumbar discectomy. BMJ Open, 12(12), e068262. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068262https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068262
• Choi, E., Gil, H. Y., Ju, J., Han, W. K., Nahm, F. S., & Lee, P. B. (2022). Effect of nonsurgical spinal decompression on intensity of pain and herniated disc volume in subacute lumbar herniated disc. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2022, 6343837. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6343837
• Cosamalón-Gan, I., Cosamalón-Gan, T., Mattos-Piaggio, G., Villar-Suárez, V., García-Cosamalón, J., & Vega-Álvarez, J. A. (2021). Inflammation in the intervertebral disc herniation. Neurocirugía (English Edition), 32(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucir.2020.01.001
• Dr. DiGrado. (2024). How spinal decompression can relieve herniated & bulging discs. https://drdigrado.com/how-spinal-decompression-therapy-can-relieve-herniated-and-bulging-discs/
• Dynamic Disc Designs. (2024). Risk factors for lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy in adults. https://dynamicdiscdesigns.com/risk-factors-for-lumbar-disc-herniation-with-radiculopathy-in-adults/
• El Paso Chiropractor Blog. (2016). The difference between disc herniation and disc bulge. https://www.elpasochiropractorblog.com/2016/10/the-difference-between-disc-herniation.html
• FYZICAL. (2006). Back pain: Is it environmental or genetic? https://www.fyzical.com/north-cotner-ne/Injuries-Conditions/Lower-Back/Research-Articles/Back-Pain-Is-It-Environmental-or-Genetic/a~724/article.html
• Gherscovici, E. D., & Mayer, J. M. (2022). Relationship of healthy building determinants with back and neck pain: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010815
• Hill DT Solutions. (2024). What is a spinal decompression table? https://www.hilldtsolutions.com/spinal-decompression-table-info
• Jimenez, A. (2025). Injury specialists – El Paso’s premier wellness and injury care clinic. https://dralexjimenez.com/
• Kamran Aghayev. (2025). Cervical disc herniation: A comprehensive overview. https://kamranaghayev.com/cervical-disc-herniation/
• Leemann, S., Peterson, C. K., Schmid, C., Anklin, B., & Humphreys, B. K. (2014). Outcomes of acute and chronic patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed symptomatic lumbar disc herniations receiving high-velocity, low-amplitude, spinal manipulative therapy: A prospective observational cohort study with one-year follow-up. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 37(3), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.01.002
• Leucadia Chiropractic. (2025). 5 risk factors that lead to a herniated disc. https://leucadiachiro.com/5-risk-factors-that-lead-to-a-herniated-disc/
• Mayo Clinic. (2024). Bulging disk vs. herniated disk: What’s the difference? https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/herniated-disk/expert-answers/bulging-disk/faq-20058428
• Neurosurgeons of New Jersey. (2023). Bulging disc vs herniated disc: How to differentiate the symptoms. https://www.neurosurgeonsofnewjersey.com/blog/bulging-disc-vs-herniated-disc/
• Neurosurgery One. (2025). Bulging disc vs. herniated disc: Does it matter? https://www.neurosurgeryone.com/blog/bulging-disc-vs-herniated-disc/
• NYP Advances. (2020). Investigating inflammatory cytokines in disc herniation. https://www.nyp.org/advances/article/orthopedics/investigating-inflammatory-cytokines-in-disc-herniation
• Pain Free Charleston. (2004). Research shows spinal decompression’s effectiveness. https://painfreecharleston.com/research.php
• Physio-pedia. (2023). Thoracic disc syndrome. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Thoracic_Disc_Syndrome
• PMC. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on non-specific low back pain in children: A twin study. European Spine Journal, 17(4), 502-508. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2295279/
• PMC. (2013). Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: Pain and disc content. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 10(1), 44-56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4151534/
• PMC. (2022). Relationship of healthy building determinants with back and neck pain: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 815. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9755707/
• Risk Factors Study. (2021). Risk factors of intervertebral disc pathology—A point of view formerly and today—A review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 726. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7865549/
• Shokri, E., Kamali, F., Sinaei, E., & Ghafarinejad, F. (2018). Spinal manipulation in the treatment of patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc herniation and sacroiliac joint hypomobility: A quasi-experimental study. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 26, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0185-z
• Spine-health. (2019). Cervical herniated disc signs and symptoms. https://www.spine-health.com/conditions/herniated-disc/cervical-herniated-disc-signs-and-symptoms
• Spine-health. (2024). Lumbar herniated disc: Causes and risk factors. https://www.spine-health.com/conditions/herniated-disc/lumbar-herniated-disc-causes-and-risk-factors
• SSPT Chiropractic. (2024). Treat cervical disc herniation with chiropractic care. https://www.ssptchiro.com/blog/ronkonkoma-cervical-disc-herniation-and-chiropractic
• Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. (2019). The incidence and most common levels of thoracic degenerative disc disease. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 52(3), 195-200. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6657757/